BYU Astronomy Research Group Joins the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC)

As of January 2021 BYU will be a member of the ARC Consortium (Link to Consortium) with access to the ARC 3.5-m telescope and the 0.5-m ARCSAT telescope.  The primary use of the ARC 3.5-m telescope time is for graduate student projects.  This provides a wide array of instrumentation that is currently being used to study objects in the solar system all the way to studies of the large scale structure of the Universe.

Other BYU Astronomy Facilities

In addition to our telescope time from the ARC consortium, we operate a number of our own astronomical facilities

West Mountain Observatory (West Mountain)

This is our mountain observatory at about 6600 ft above sea level.  This consists of three telescopes: 0.9-m, 0.5-m, and a 0.32-m. It is a 40 minute drive that ends in a 5 miles drive up a dirt road. The mountain itself can be seen from campus. We don't provide any tours of this facility.

Orson Pratt Observatory

The Orson Pratt Observatory is named for an early apostle of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.  It is our campus telescope facility and contains a wide variety of telescopes for student research and public outreach. We operate a 24" PlaneWave telescope in the main campus dome, plus a 16", two 12", one 8", and a 6" telescope on our observation deck.  The telescopes are all fully robotic. Beyond this we have a large sections of telescopes used on public nights.

Royden G. Derrick Planetarium (Planetarium)

This is a 119 seat, 39" dome planetarium with acoustically treated walls to allow it's use as a lecture room. Recently we upgraded to an E&S Digistar7 operating system with 4K projectors.  The planetarium is used for teaching classes, public outreach, and astronomy education research projects.





Selected Publications

Thumbnail of figure from publication
In a previous paper, Taylor has found that the solar value of (R - I)C is 0.337 +/- 0.0024 mag. This result can be converted to a value of (B - V). by combining it with blanketing corrections and a Hyades color-color relation. The latter are derived and discussed in this paper. The resulting value of (B - V). turns out to be 0.633 +/- 0.009 mag. Annoyingly, this datum differs from the mean of a number of previous results at better than 99.5% confidence. A survey of the problem reveals a wavelength boundary: Hbeta and Halpha yield the result quoted above, while spectroscopy at wavelengths shortward of Hbeta yields [(B - V).] = 0.665 +/- 0.003 mag. The Balmer-line derivations are largely blanketing insensitive, so for the present, it seems defensible to assume that the Balmer-line result is correct and that its short-wavelength counterparts are affected by some unknown property of the solar blanketing.
Thumbnail of figure from publication
A calibration presented in a previous paper is used in this paper to derive temperatures for FGK stars near the main sequence. The calibration is checked against published counterparts, and it is found that previous calibrations have not established K-dwarf temperatures in particular beyond reasonable doubt. The database assembled to derive the temperatures is described, and the problems posed by close binaries are evaluated. The newly derived temperatures are used to check a line-depth ratio proposed as a thermometer by Gray and Johanson (1991, PASP, 103, 439), and it is found that the ratio is metallicity-sensitive. Temperatures are given for a total of 417 stars.
Thumbnail of figure from publication

We have compared the Hyades, Coma, and a set of field standard stars in the V and Stromgren-beta systems. If Stromgren data by Crawford and his collaborators are considered, all the data turn out to be on the same system; no corrections as large as several mmag are required to achieve this state. For beta, similar consistency between the Hyades and Coma is already known to exist. We find that for the standard stars, beta values from the literature are consistent with the Hyades-Coma system. For V, we adopt corrections derived previously by Joner and Taylor for published cluster photometry. Given these corrections, we find that within rather generous accidental-error limits, the V systems for the field stars and the clusters agree. With one puzzling exception (namely, b-y for the field stars and the Hyades), recent results published by Stetson agree with ours. Because our result is from direct comparison, we suggest that it should be preferred in this case. However, we also note the need for further comparison between our adopted standard stars and the Gronbech-Olsen stars which Stetson used.

Thumbnail of figure from publication

From published FGK-star data, the solar value of (R-I)C is found to be 0.337+/-0.0024 mag. The equivalent value of (R-I)J is 0.343+/-0.0033 mag. The data base which yields these values includes integrated H-alpha and H-beta measurements and also temperatures derived from Balmer-line wings. These latter temperatures can be combined with the quoted value of (R-I)C and data from the infrared flux method to yield a temperature calibration. The result is theta=1.075 (R-I)C+0.510, and is valid for F III-V, G IV-V, and K V stars with 0.06 less-than-or-equal-to (R-I)C less-than-or-equal-to 0.50 mag.

Thumbnail of figure from publication

Recently, Taylor has established an [Fe/H] zero point for K giants. Taylor's work permits a reassessment of the well-known mu Leo metallicity of Branch, Bonnell & Tomkin (BBT). Correction to the new zero point lowers the BBT result from +0.48 to +0.35 dex, with the correction being significant at about 97% confidence. It is also possible to set an upper limit on sigma-BBT, the standard deviation of the uncorrected BBT datum. This limit turns out to be 0.17 dex at 95% confidence. Given these results, the corrected datum yields a lower limit at 95% confidence which may be as small as [Fe/H] = 0.12 dex. The BBT result is therefore not decisive evidence for supermetallicity in K giants.

Thumbnail of figure from publication
This paper presents "primary" [Fe/H] averages for 373 evolved K stars (see section 4). These stars are of luminosity classes II-IV, and their values of [Fe/H] lie between -0.9 and +0.21 dex. The contributing data are from 58 high-dispersion papers and three spectrum-synthesis papers. The data have been selected (and in many cases, corrected) to be as free as possible from systematic error. References are given with the averages to encourage users to cite original sources. For the stars considered, the data define a "consensus" zero point with a precision of +/- 0.018 dex. In addition, analysis yields rms errors per datum which are typically 0.08-0.16 dex. There is no dependable reduction in the sizes of these errors when sensitive detectors such as Reticons are used. The averaged values of [Fe/H] reflect the consensus zero point, and they are based on weights which follow from the rms errors. The primary data base makes recalibration possible for two large [Fe/H] catalogs. Temperature corrections are necessary for both catalogs, and, while the corrections are 0.12 dex or less for the data of Hansen & Kjaergaard, they are as large as 0.4 dex for a recent survey of Brown et al. The corrected data are included in a "secondary" data base for 669 stars without primary data. Smaller data sets from two additional papers are also included in this data base. Weighting for the secondary data is again based on rms errors. Also given in section 4 are a set of [Fe/H] standard stars and a new DDO calibration. The rms errors for the standard-star data are 0.07 dex or less. These data and the DDO calibration reflect the consensus zero point. For normal K giants, CN-based values of [Fe/H] turn out to be more precise than many high-dispersion results. Some zero-point errors in the latter are also found, and new examples of continuum-placement problems appear. It therefore appears that, at present, high-dispersion results are not invariably superior to photometric metallicities. In section 5 a review is given of high-dispersion and related work on supermetallicity in K III-IV stars. The super-metal-rich (SMR) status of one subgiant (31 Aql) is found to be well established. Despite some assertions in the literature, however, no decisive high-dispersion case can be made at present for the existence of SMR K giants. Such stars may exist, but deciding this question will require further work.